- 15 1. To declare as admissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case J. v. Peru filed by the State and the representative of the victim. 2. To specify the meaning and scope of the considerations of the Court regarding the legal classification of the ill-treatment suffered by Ms. J. at the time of her arrest, in accordance with paragraphs 19 to 21 of this judgment of interpretation. 3. To dismiss as inadmissible the objections made by the State and the representative regarding the legal effects of the violation of rights mentioned in paragraph 227 of the judgment, the criteria and methodology used to determine the amounts established as costs and expenses, and the alleged effects of the material rectification of paragraph 87 of the judgment, to the extent that they are not in accordance with the provisions of Articles 67 of the Convention and 68 of the Rules of Procedure, as indicated in paragraphs 25 to 31, 34 to 35, and 40 to 41 of this judgment of interpretation. 4. To rectify the material errors in paragraphs 87 and 268 of the judgment, regarding the property to which the mother of Ms. J. and her sister were taken and the position of the deponent for information purposes, Federico Javier Llaque Moya, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 38 of this judgment of interpretation. 5. To order that the Secretariat of the Court notify this judgment of Interpretation to the Republic of Peru, the representatives of the victim, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.