22 Luiza Monteiro Teixeira; 18) Maria Eliana de Castro Pinheiro; 19) Maria Leonor Pereira Marques; 20) Maristella Nurchis; 21) Rosa Olímpio; 22) Rosana de Moura Momente; 23) Sônia Maria Haas; 24) Terezinha Souza Amorim; 25) Valéria Costa Couto, and 26) Viriato Augusto Oliveira47, alleged victims, proposed by the representatives. They declared on the issues related to: a) their family relationship with the alleged disappeared victims; b) the manner in which they came to know about the enforced disappearances; c) the personal efforts and actions that the next of kin took to ascertain the truth of the events and find the bodily remains of their loved ones; d) the political context lived after the disappearances; e) the actions of the public authorities, as well as other obstacles in their search for justice; f) the pecuniary and non-pecuniary consequences of the disappearances, and the lack of truth and justice in their personal and family life, and g) the compensation received; 27) Danilo Carneiro, witness proposed by the representatives. Declared on: a) the alleged activities of the activists of said region, and b) the pattern of repression that was in place by the State during the military regime, and in particular, the modus operandi of the alleged detentions and torture perpetrated by state agents and their collaborators against the political opposition and their collaborators in the region; 28) Edmundo Teobaldo Müller Neto, witness proposed by the State. Declared on the alleged activities of the Tocantins Working Group established by Decree No. 567/MD, with the purpose of locating, collecting, and identifying the bodies of the Guerrilla and soldiers who died in the episode known as the Guerrilha do Araguaia; 29) Jaime Antunes da Silva,48 Director of the National Archive, witness proposed by the State. Declared on the alleged implementation of the “Centro de Referência das Lutas Políticas no Brasil (1964-1985) Memórias Reveladas,” [Center of Reference of the Political Struggles in Brazil (19641985) Memories Revealed] which dealt with the recuperation and availability of the archives of the security organs of the state of emergency regime; 30) Flavia Piovesan,49 professor of Constitutional Law and Human Rights, expert witness proposed by the Commission. Rendered an expert opinion on: a) the Law No. 11.111, and the Decrees No. 2.134/97, No. 4.553/02, and No. 5.584/05, in regard to the fundamental rights established in the Federal Constitution of 1988, and b) the consequences of this regulation for the compliance of the judgment issued in the framework of the Ordinary Action No. 82.00.24682-5, with the purpose of examining the specific possibility of the execution of said ruling; 31) Damián Miguel Loreti Urba, expert attorney on freedom of expression and secrecy laws, expert witness proposed by the Commission. Rendered an expert opinion on Law No. 11.111, the Decrees No. 2.134/97, No. 47 Cf. Case of Gomes Lund et al. (“Guerrilha do Araguaia”) v. Brazil. Reconsideration. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 19, 2010, Considering clauses 23 to 29 and Operative Paragraph 1. 48 Cf. Case of Gomes Lund et al. (“Guerrilha do Araguaia”), supra note 47, Considering clauses 12 to 16 and Operative Paragraph 1 49 Cf. Case of Gomes Lund et al. (“Guerrilha do Araguaia”). Reconsideration, supra note 47, Having Seen 4 and 7.