homepages of each website. Finally, in accordance with the compliance agreement signed, the State published, once, the official summary of the Judgment in the General Ministerial Order No. 245, article 3, and provided a copy. 6. Both the representatives and the Inter-American Commission expressed their approval of the publications issued by the State in compliance with the Operative paragraph concerning publication of the Judgment. 7. From the information and documents submitted by the parties, the Court notes that the State has complied with its obligation to publish the official summary of the Judgment in the Official Gazette (Official Record), in a newspaper of wide national circulation and on two official websites. The Court also observes that these obligations were met within the period stipulated in paragraph 141 of the Judgment (supra Having seen paragraph 1). Likewise, it notes that in addition to the measures ordered by the Court, the State also published the official summary of the Judgment in the General Ministerial Order No. 245. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its judgments and pursuant to Articles 33, 62.1, 62.3, and 68.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 24 and 30 of the Statute, and 31.2 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES THAT: 1. In accordance with the relevant Considering paragraphs of this Order, the State has fully complied with its obligation to publish the official summary of the Judgment in the Official Gazette and in a newspaper of wide national circulation, and to publish the entire Judgment on an official website (Operative paragraph 2 of the Judgment). 2. The procedure for monitoring compliance shall continue with respect to Operative paragraph 3 of the Judgment regarding the duty of the State to “pay the amounts established in paragraphs 156 and 163, within the respective periods, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, and costs and expenses, in the terms and conditions indicated in paragraphs 150 to 155 and 161, 162 and 164 of the […] Judgment.” AND DECIDES TO: 1. Issue a ruling regarding the reparation measures ordered in Operative paragraph 3 of the Judgment of July 5, 2011, once the Republic of Ecuador presents its report on compliance ordered in the Judgment. 2. Request the representatives of the victim and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit any observations deemed pertinent to the report of the Republic of Ecuador mentioned in Operative paragraph 1 of this Order, within a period of four and six weeks, respectively, as of receipt of the report. 3