ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JULY 1, 2011 CASE OF LOAYZA TAMAYO v. PERU MONITORING OF COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgments on the merits, reparations, and costs, and the interpretation of the latter rendered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or “the Inter-American Court,” or “the Tribunal”) on September 17, 1997, November 27, 1998, and June 3, 1999, respectively. 2. The Orders of Monitoring of Compliance with Judgment on reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) rendered by the Court on November 17, 1999, June 1, 2001, November 27, 2002, November 27, 2003, March 3, 2005, September 22, 2006, December 13, 2007, and February 6, 2008. In the last Order, the Court declared, inter alia: 1. That it will keep open the proceeding for monitoring compliance with the still-pending items in the instant case, namely: a) The reinstatement of María Elena Loayza-Tamayo in the teaching sector in public institutions, on the understanding that the amount of her salary and other benefits is to be equal to the remuneration she was receiving for these activities in the public and private sector at the time of her detention (Operative paragraph 1 of the judgment on reparations, November 27, 1988); b) The guaranteeing of her full retirement benefits, including those owed for the period transpired since the time of her detention (Operative paragraph 2 of the judgment on reparations, November 27, 1998); c) The adoption of all domestic legal measures necessary to ensure that no adverse decision delivered in proceedings against Loayza-Tamayo in the civil courts has any effect whatsoever (Operative paragraph 3 of the judgment on reparations, November 27, 1998); d) The adoption of the internal legal measures necessary to adapt Decree-Laws 25,475 (Crime of Terrorism) and 25,659 (Crime of Treason) to conform to the American Convention (Operative paragraph 5 of the judgment on reparations, November 27, 1998), and e) The investigation of the facts of the instant case, identifying and punishing those responsible for those acts, and the adoption of all necessary domestic legal measures to ensure that this obligation is discharged (Operative paragraph 6 of the judgment on reparations, November 27, 1998). 3. The briefs of the Republic of Peru (hereinafter “the State,” “the State of Peru,” or “Peru”) of April 30, 2008, June 29, 2009, March 29, May 7, June 22, and July 27, 2010, and