ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF OCTOBER 24, 2012 CASE OF SALVADOR CHIRIBOGA v. ECUADOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on preliminary objection and merits delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter the “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) on May 6, 2008. 2. The Judgment on reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court on March 3, 2011, in which it ordered that: […] 2. The State must pay to María Salvador Chiriboga, for fair compensation, the amount indicated in paragraph 84 of the Judgment. 3. The State must pay for the interest incurred on the pecuniary damage, the amount specified in paragraph 101 of th[e] Judgment. 4. The State must make the payments of fair compensation and pecuniary damage established in th[e] Judgment, in accordance with the method of compliance established in paragraphs 102 to 104 of th[e] Judgment. 5. The State must pay, for compensation of non-pecuniary damage, the amount established in paragraph 112 of th[e] Judgment, within the respective time frame and in the terms indicated in paragraphs 109 to 111, and 113 of th[e] Judgment. 6. The State must pay for costs and expenses the amount established in paragraph 141 of the […] Judgment, within the respective time frame and in the terms indicated in paragraph 140 of th[e] Judgment. 7. The State must reimburse María Salvador Chiriboga, as a measure of restitution, the amount indicated in paragraph 124 for property taxes, additional charges, and other taxes, as well as for a surcharge on a lot without constructions that was collected unduly, together with the corresponding interest, within six months, in keeping with the provisions of the said paragraph of the Judgment. 8. The State must make the publications ordered in paragraph 127 of th[e] Judgment, as and when established in the said paragraph. […] 3. The brief of June 19, 2012, in which the Republic of Ecuador (hereinafter the “State” or “Ecuador”) presented information on compliance with the Judgment delivered by the Court in this case (supra having seen paragraph 2).