50. On the first point, the term "justice operators" has been used by this Court in a broad sense, including not only judges, but also, among others, prosecutors7 and public defenders.8 Therefore, training for "justice operators" can be understood as referring to those officials who play a central role in ensuring access to justice for older persons and can include judges, prosecutors, and public defenders. Also, depending on the context, the term "justice operators" could cover other actors, including prison and police personnel. In the instant case, the Court considers that, in light of the facts and violations found in the Judgment, the training plan should be directed at judges. 51. On the other hand, the Court considers that the evaluation of the training programs for judges and other justice operators implemented by the State is an aspect related to the monitoring of compliance with the Judgment and should not be the object of an abstract pronouncement by the Inter-American Court in this Judgment. Consequently, it declares the request for interpretation on this point inadmissible. 52. In conclusion, this Court interprets that, in light of the facts and violations found in the Judgment, the training plan referred to in paragraph 216 of the Judgment, as a guarantee of non-repetition, should be aimed at judges. V OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 53. Therefore, THE COURT DECIDE, Unanimously: 1. To declare admissible the request for interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, presented by the State, pursuant to paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Interpretation Judgment. 2. To clarify, by means of an Interpretation, the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, with respect to the use of the expression "annual installments", pursuant to 16 to 20 of this Interpretation Judgment. 3. To clarify, by means of an Interpretation, the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, with respect to the modalities of compliance with the payments ordered, pursuant to paragraphs 28 and 29 of this Interpretation Judgment. 7 Case of Martínez Esquivia v. Colombia. Preliminary Objections, Merits and Reparations. Judgment of October 6, 2020. Series C No. 412, para. 94, and Case of Cuya Lavy et al. v. Peru. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 28, 2021. Series C No. 438, para. 128. 8 Case of García Cruz and Sánchez Silvestre v. Mexico. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 26, 2013. Series C No. 273, para. 92. 13