4. To clarify, by means of an Interpretation, the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, with respect to the calculation of readjustment and interest, as well as the incidence of interest in arrears to the sums due for restitution, pursuant to 34 to 36 and 39 of this Interpretation Judgment. 5. To dismiss as inadmissible the request filed by the State for interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, regarding the calculation of interest in cases in which the heirs of any of the beneficiaries are not determined or, even if they are determined, the inheritance proceedings have not been carried out, pursuant to of paragraphs 37, 38 and 39 of this Interpretation Judgment. 6. To dismiss as inadmissible the request filed by the State for interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, with respect to the mechanisms applicable to the search for heirs of the successors, pursuant to paragraphs 44 and 45 of this Interpretation Judgment. 7. To clarify, by means of an Interpretation, the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, with respect to the use of the expression "justice operators," pursuant to paragraphs 50 and 52 of this Interpretation Judgment. 8. To declare inadmissible the request filed by the State for interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs in the case of the Teachers of Chañaral and other Municipalities v. Chile, with respect to the training provided to judges in the domestic sphere, pursuant to paragraph 51 of this Interpretation Judgment. 9. To order that the Registrar of the Court notify the Republic of Chile, the representatives of the victims and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of this Interpretation Judgment. 14