CEJIL

10 Sergio García Ramírez Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Search Tips

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE 1
II JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 2
III PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION 4
IV PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
V PREVIOUS CONSIDERATIONS7
VI EVIDENCE 8
a) DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE9
b) EXPERT EVIDENCE11
c) ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE 11
VII PROVEN FACTS 11
VIIIARTICLES 5(1) AND 5(2) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTIONIN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLES 1.1 AND 2 OF THE CONVENTION(RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY) 16
IX ARTICLES 8 AND 25 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTIONIN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 OF THE CONVENTION(RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION) 30
X REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention) 34
A) MORAL DAMAGES36
B) OTHER FORMS OF REPARATION 37
C)COSTS AND FEES38
XI MEANS OF COMPLIANCE39
XII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS39
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GARCÍA RAMÍREZ 42
CONCURRING JUDGMENT OF JUDGE JACKMAN 52
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE A.A. CANÇADO TRINDADE 55
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VENTURA ROBLES83

IACourt judgment

Type

Mechanism

Country

Signatories

Separate vote

Caesar. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. March 11, 2005.pdf
English
Download View
Caesar. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 11 de marzo de 2005.pdf
Spanish
Download View

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Select relationship type

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.