monitored and executed by the Inter-Institutional Commission on the Espírito Santo Socio-Educational System (hereinafter “the Inter-Institutional Commission”). The representatives have been invited to participate in the regular meetings of the aforementioned Commission in order “to follow compliance with the promised actions”; b) the “Inter-Institutional Procedures for Apprehending and Routing Juveniles in Conflict with the Law to Socio-Educational Assistance,” which will guide the work processes of all institutions involved in socio-educational assistance in the state of Espírito Santo; c) the Institute of Socio-Educational Assistance for the state of Espírito Santo (hereinafter “the Institute” or “UNIS”) continued the process of regionalizing its offices as well as its juvenile commitment centers; d) between May and June of 2011, 372 professionals from the Institute received training on, among other topics, the role of the educator, the Children’s Code, public policies, ethics, human rights, citizenship, security procedures, crisis management, and citizen security; e) the Attorney General audited the transfer of juveniles from UNIS to other facilities and began the “MP Day at the UNIS” project, whereby the prosecutor responsible for the execution of commitment measures spends one day a month in that institution assisting juveniles. The first day of this project was on May 11, 2011, and complaints “of rights violations [...] were sent [...] to UNIS”; f) the Office of the Public Defender (hereinafter also “the Public Ombudsman”) visited UNIS on March 28, 2011 and reported, among other things, that “the [custody] conditions are within the recommended parameters.” Also, during the UNIS visit from March 29-31, 2011, “the inmates declared with near unanimity that they maintain good relations with the socio-educational agents [and] none of the juveniles complained as to the agents’ conduct, on the contrary, they praised the work carried out by them.” On the other hand, regarding inadequate treatment, “the inmates unanimously complained of the excesses of socio-educational agents allegedly committed during restraint procedures. The majority of inmates spoke of the existence of torture, but when they were asked if they had been victims of the practice, they responded in the negative. The accusations of torture invariably affected other inmates who have already been released.” On July 5, 2011, the Public Ombudsman conducted another visit to UNIS, ratified its previous conclusions, and indicated new improvements in the quality of assistance offered to juveniles since its previous visit; g) in relation to the UNIS infrastructure, past accommodations were dismantled and replaced with the modules “Awaken” I, II, and III, which will be readapted so that the total capacity is reduced to 60 inmates; h) the hourly total for schooling increased from two to three and a half hours per day, and the educational program was modified with the inclusion of civic activities and technical courses; 4