6 16. In its observations the representative asked that the Court request from the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights a copy of the mentioned consultancy contract, duly legalized, stating in detail: objectives, methods, means, resources, timetable, and costs of the execution of the project, in compliance with the principle of transparency. Likewise, it requested that the Court ask the State for a copy of the general module on human rights, drawn up and validated by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights. 17. In its observations the Commission stated that it does not have information regarding the programs mentioned by the State or with a timetable, progress and results obtained in their application. Therefore, the Commission is awaiting the filing of said information, as well as the start of the training programs as soon as possible. 18. The Court values the measures the State has adopted upon celebrating an institutional agreement with the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights to develop a training module in human rights of patients addressed to the justice operators and health professionals. However, this Tribunal considers it necessary that the State present updated and detailed information on: a) content of the module, main subjects, approach (methodology), materials, and their handling; legislation and jurisprudence; b) timetable for the application of the training sessions and indication of the staff that will be in charge of them; c) methodology, materials, administration, and timetable for the implementation of the replication training, and d) list of the justice operators and health professionals that will receive the training module, their respective positions, and entity to which they belong. Therefore, in order to monitor compliance with the seventh operative paragraph of the Judgment (supra Having Seen paragraph 1), the Court requests that the State provide the mentioned information as well as the specific measures carried out in this sense. * * * 19. The Court will consider the general state of compliance with the Judgment (supra Having Seen paragraph 1) once it receives the corresponding information on the reparations pending compliance. Therefore: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions, pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 25(1) and 30 of its Statute and Articles 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, Declares: 1. That it will maintain open the procedure of monitoring compliance with the matters pending compliance in the present case, namely: