CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

I/A Court HR. Case of Cordero Bernal v. Peru. Preliminary objection and merits. Judgment of February 16, 2021. Elizabeth Odio Benito President L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire Eduardo Vio Grossi Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Elizabeth Odio Benito President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 29

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
10relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE3
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT4
III JURISDICTION5
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTION5
A. Alleged lack of jurisdiction ratione materiae of the Inter-American Court to review domestic decisions (“fourth instance” objection)5
A.1. Arguments of the State, observations of the Commission and of the representatives5
A.2. Considerations of the Court6
V EVIDENCE6
A. Admissibility of the documentary evidence6
B. Admissibility of the statements offered7
VI FACTS8
A. Legal framework applicable to disciplinary proceedings against judges in Peru in force at the time of the facts8
B. Appointment of Héctor Fidel Cordero Bernal as Fourth Criminal Judge of the city of Huánuco9
C. Decision to grant unconditional release to two defendants10
D. Disciplinary proceeding11
D.1 Procedure before the Office for Control of Judges (OCMA)11
D.2 Procedure before the National Council of the Judiciary (CNM)12
E. Amparo procedure13
F. Criminal proceedings14
G. Appeal for annulment15
VII MERITS16
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission16
B. Considerations of the Court18
B.1 The guarantee of judicial independence in relation to the principle of legality, political rights and the guarantee of duly substantiated decisions18
B.2 The principle of the application of the most favorable law24
B.5 Conclusion25
VII-2 JUDICIAL PROTECTION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND TO ENSURE THE RIGHTSAND TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LEGAL PROVISIONS25
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission25
B. Considerations of the Court25
VIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS27
JUDGE L. PATRICIO PAZMIÑO FREIRE30
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EDUARDO FERRER MAC-GREGOR POISOT32

Cordero Bernal. Sentencia de 16 de febrero de 2021

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Excepciones Preliminares
Fondo

Fecha: 16 feb 2021

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C 421

País

Perú

Firmantes

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Elizabeth Odio Benito
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Leoncio Patricio Pazmiño Freire
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique

Votos separados

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Leoncio Patricio Pazmiño Freire

Documentos primarios

Cordero Bernal. Sentencia de 16 de febrero de 2021.pdf
Spanish
Descargar Ver
Cordero Bernal. Judgment. February 16, 2021.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Cordero Bernal. Judgment. February 16, 2021.docx126.56 kB

Cordero Bernal. Sentencia de 16 de febrero de 2021.docx226.58 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH1
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH1
País1
- País1
Firmantes3
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a3
Firmante Voto separado1
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a1
Votos separados2
- Voto Separado2
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.