soon as possible. Thus, the Court awaits updated information concerning the measures taken in this regard. 29. Lastly, in relation to the obligation to guarantee the conditions for the return to El Salvador, the Court takes note that Gregoria Herminia Recinos Contreras has expressed her wish to return to El Salvador. In this regard, it assesses positively the State’s willingness: (a) to assume its obligation to provide appropriate psychosocial assistance and pay the expenses of moving the victim and her family; (b) to assume the necessary support and coordination to regularize all the migratory aspects in El Salvador of the victim and her family, and (c) to offer a possible house located in the department of San Vicente, place of residence of her brother Serapio Cristian Contreras. Consequently, and in keeping with the information presented by the parties, the Court awaits updated information concerning the measures taken to comply with this aspect of this reparation. 30. Based on all the above, the Court considers that the State has complied fully with its obligation to adopt all the necessary and appropriate measures to restore the identity of Gregoria Herminia Recinos Contreras, including her first and last names, and other personal information in El Salvador. In addition, it finds that, despite the progress reported, the obligation to activate and use the available diplomatic mechanisms to coordinate cooperation with the Republic of Guatemala in order to expedite the correction of the identity of Gregoria Herminia Recinos Contreras, including her first and last names and other data in the records of that State, remains pending, as well as to guarantee the conditions for the return of Gregoria Herminia Contreras when she decides to return to El Salvador permanently. d) Obligation to provide, immediately, medical and psychological and psychiatric treatment to the victims who request this and, as appropriate, pay the sum established to Gregoria Herminia Contreras, as established in the Judgment (fifth operative paragraph of the Judgment) 31. The State indicated that, in March 2011, in keeping with the obligation it had assumed since the initial processing of these proceedings, it commenced the measures of physical health care for the members of the Contreras, Mejía Ramírez and Rivera families, after coordinating with the representatives and based on a general medical evaluation of each person to determine their individual needs and requirements. This care is provided by three hospitals of the public health network located in the regions of the country corresponding to the place of residence of each family, where they are provided with doctors’ appointments, medicines, periodic medical check-ups, and surgery and dental services. In addition, for the routine controls and treatment that does not need to be carried out in a hospital, they have access to health centers near their places of residence. The State was also continuing its seminars to train and raise the awareness of the medical, nursing, social work, administrative and legal hospital personnel with regard to the status of the patients as victims of human rights violations and the State’s obligations. In addition, the State was seeking to promote “a methodology of supervising the health care services from the perspective of shared responsibility.”16 16 In this regard, the State advised that in May 2012, a meeting was held in the Community Intermediate Health Unit (UCS) of Ciudad Arce, La Libertad, with the participation of one of the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda lawyers. At this meeting some incidents that had occurred during the treatment provided to Agustín Rivera Rivera and María Rivera Cartagena were discussed, and agreements were reached on the socialization of the case to the health personnel, the specific identification of the medical records of the patients, and the special collaboration of the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda in raising the awareness of the victims with regard to their responsibility to take care of their health and the appropriate use of the institutional services. A meeting was also held with this Association in the Community Health Unit of San Carlos Lempa, in San Vicente, during which the medical histories were revised 12