3.1 Public responsibility act of acknowledgement of international 296. The representatives requested that a public act of acknowledgement of responsibility be organized in the Community’s main settlement, according to their customs and traditions, and that it be disseminated by the media. The State indicated that it “had no objection to making a public acknowledgement, provided that the exact nature of the Community’s intention was defined […] and […] that it was organized in a similar way to the act carried out in the Yakye Axa and Sawhoyamaxa cases.” 297. As it has ordered in other cases,304 in order to repair the damage caused to the victims, the Court finds it necessary that the State carry out a public act to acknowledge its international responsibility for the violations declared in this judgment. This act must be agreed upon previously with the Community. Furthermore, the act must take place at the current site of the Community, during a public ceremony attended by senior State authorities and the members of the Community, including those who live in other areas; to this end, the State must provide the necessary means to facilitate transportation. The leaders of the Community must be permitted to participate in the said act. Moreover, the State must conduct this act in the Community’s languages, and in Spanish and Guaraní, and must broadcast it on a radio station with wide coverage in the Chaco. The State must organize this act within one year of notification of this judgment. 3.2 Publication and broadcast of the judgment 298. Although the representatives did not request this measure of reparation, the Court finds that it is relevant and important as a measure of satisfaction due to the length of time that the Community has been claiming its rights. Therefore, as the Court has ordered in other cases,305 the State must publish once, in the Official Gazette, paragraphs 1 to 5, 32, 42, 43, 48 to 50, 64 to 84, 89, 95, 99, 101, 102, 106, 107, 109 to 116, 119 to 121, 127 a 131, 134 to 138, 143 to 145, 149 to 154, 158, 161, 162, 166, 168 to 170, 182, 189 to 193, 195, 196, 200 to 202, 205, 206, 208, 213 to 217, 222, 223, 225 to 234, 240, 244, 251 to 255, 259 to 260, 263, 264, 273 to 275 and 278, all including the headings of each chapter and the respective section - without the footnotes - as well as the operative paragraphs of this judgment. It must publish the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court in a daily newspaper with national circulation. In addition, as the Court has ordered in previous cases,306 this judgment must be published in its entirety on an official web page, to be available for one year. The State must publish this judgment in the newspapers and on the Internet, within six months of notification of this judgment. 299. Moreover, as it has previously,307 the Court finds it appropriate that the State publicize the official summary of the judgment delivered by the Court on a radio 304 Cf. Case of Huilca Tecse v. Peru. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of March 3, 2005. Series C No. 121, para. 111; Case of the “Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala, supra note 12, para. 261, and Case of Manuel Cepeda Vargas v. Colombia, supra note 8, para. 222. 305 Cf. Case of Barrios Altos v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Series C No. 87, operative paragraph 5(d)); Case of Chitay Nech et al. v. Guatemala, supra note 8, para. 244, and Case of Manuel Cepeda Vargas v. Colombia, supra note 8, para. 220. 306 Cf. Case of the Serrano Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of March 1, 2005. Series C No. 120, para. 195; Case of Chitay Nech et al. v. Guatemala, supra note 8, para. 244, and Case of Manuel Cepeda Vargas v. Colombia, supra note 8, para. 220. 307 Cf. Case of Yatama v. Nicaragua, supra note 297, para. 253; Case of Tiu Tojín v. Guatemala, supra note 298, para. 108, and Case of Chitay Nech et al. v. Guatemala, supra note 8, para. 245. 68