17 should not be limited only by the manifestations or actions of the plaintiffs in each case.”56 43. It may even happen that in the domestic forum there be appeals or measures of defense that are appropriate and efficient to combat the lack of or improper exercise of the "diffused the control of conformity with convention" by a judge (for example, through an appeal, cassation remedy, or petition for legal protection [amparo]), upon this control not being exercised ex oficio. This regards a new aspect of the principle of iura novit curia (the judge knows the law and jurisprudence of the Convention). D) Parameter of “diffused control of conformity with the Convention”: The “Block of Conformity with the Convention” 44. In principle, the parameter of the "diffused the control of conformity with convention" by national judges (regardless of whether or not they implement the control of constitutionality), is the Pact of San Jose and the jurisprudence of the I/A Court of H.R. that interprets it. The last part of the jurisprudential doctrine so provides: “In this task, the judges and bodies linked to the administration of justice must take into account not only the Pact of San José, but also the interpretation of it made by the Inter-American Court, the last interpreter of the American Convention.57 (underlining added). 45. Nevertheless, the “jurisprudence” itself of the I/A Court of H.R. has expanded the Inter-American corpus juris in regard to human rights in order to establish foundations for its rulings. It should not go unnoticed that it is the Pact of San Jose which permits the inclusion "in the system of protection of this Convention, other rights and freedoms recognized in accordance with Articles 76 and 77," which has allowed for the approval of various “additional” Protocols to (the American Convention) and their interpretation by the Inter-American Court. Likewise, the Pact itself establishes as an interpretive norm that one can not exclude or limit the effect that the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man and "other international acts of the same nature."58 46. Regarding this, the opinions in the concurring opinion Judge García Ramírez in the Case of the Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado Alfaro et al.) v. Peru are illustrative, specifically regarding the analysis of the parameter of “control of conformity with the Convention”:59 In the instant case, when referring to the control of “conventionality,” the Inter-American Court has considered the applicability and application of the American Convention on Human Rights, Pact of San José. However, the same function is deployed, for the same reasons, with regard to other instruments of a similar nature, that comprise the corpus juris arising from the human rights conventions to which the State is a party: the Protocol of 56 Para. 128, in fine, Case of Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado Alfaro et al.) v. Perú, supra note 15. 57 Case of Cabrera García and Montiel Flores v. Mexico, supra note 1, para. 227. 58 Article 29, d). See supra note 50. 59 Para. 2 of the concurring opinion of judge Sergio García Ramírez, regarding the Judgment of cited case, of November 24, 2006.