98 1(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, for the cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment afforded to Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera Garcia and Rodolfo Montiel Flores, according to the terms of paragraphs 100 to 125 of this Judgment. 4. The State has failed to comply with the obligation to investigate the alleged acts of torture, in the terms of Articles 5(1) and 5(2), in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 1, 6 and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture, to the detriment of Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera Garcia and Rodolfo Montiel Flores, in accordance the paragraphs 126 to 132 of this Judgment 5. The State is responsible for the violation of the principle of freedom from ex post facto laws, enshrined in article 8(3), in conjunction with article 1(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera Garcia and Rodolfo Montiel Flores, according to the terms of paragraphs 165 to 177 of this Judgment. 6. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to a fair trial [judicial guarantees] and judicial protection, enshrined in Articles 8(1) and 25(1), respectively, in conjunction with Articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights, for having submitted the hearing of the alleged torture to the criminal military jurisdiction, to the detriment of Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera García and Rodolfo Montiel Flores, in accordance with paragraphs 197 to 201, 203 to 204 and 205 to 206 of this Judgment. 7. It does not correspond to issue a ruling on the alleged violations of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] and freedom of association, embodied in articles 5(1) and 16 of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of the relatives of Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera Garcia and Rodolfo Montiel Flores and to their detriment, respectively, according to the terms of paragraphs 56 to 60 of this Judgment. 8. The State has failed to comply with the obligation contained in article 2, in connection with articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, by extending jurisdiction of the military courts over crimes that are not closely related to the military discipline or legal interests typical of the military, according to the terms of paragraph 206 of this Judgment. 9. The State is not responsible for the violation of the right to defense, embodied in article 8(2)(d) of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera Garcia and Rodolfo Montiel Flores, under the terms of paragraphs 154 to 162 of this Judgment. 10. The State is not responsible for the violation of the principle of presumption of innocence, embodied in article 8(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera Garcia and Rodolfo Montiel Flores, under the terms of paragraphs 182 to 186 of this Judgment. AND ORDERS, Unanimously that: 11. This Judgment is in itself a form of redress.