ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* OF FEBRUARY 22, 2011 CASE OF CANTORAL HUAMANÍ AND GARCÍA SANTA CRUZ v. PERU. MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT. HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on the preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter, “the Judgment”), passed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court” or “the Tribunal”) on July 10, 2007, whereby it ordered that: […] 9. The State shall immediately investigate the acts that led to the violations in the present case, and identify, prosecute and, if applicable, punish those responsible, pursuant to paragraphs 189 to 191 of the […] Judgment. The results of the proceedings shall be publicized so that Peruvian society has access to the judicial determination of the facts and those responsible in this case. 10. The State shall publish, in the Official Gazette and in another widely distributed national newspaper, chapters VII to X of the […] Judgment, and the operative paragraphs thereof, without the corresponding footnotes. It shall do so within six months of notification of [...] the Judgment. 11. The State shall, within six months of notification of the […] Judgment, hold a public act of acknowledgment for its international responsibility in the violations declared in this Judgment in order achieve redress for the victims and to the satisfaction of their families. It shall do so in public ceremony attended by State authorities and the family members named as victims in the […] Judgment, pursuant to paragraph 193 of the […] Judgment. It should disseminate this act through the media, in accordance with the terms of paragraph 193 of the Judgment. 12. The State shall grant a scholarship, for a Peruvian public institution, to Ulises Cantoral-Huamaní, Pelagia Mélida Contreras-Montoya de Cantoral and the children of Saúl Cantoral-Huamaní. The scholarship shall cover all education expenses, from the moment the beneficiaries make the request to the State up until the completion of their postsecondary studies, training or refresher course, be it technical or university-level, pursuant to paragraph 194 of the […] Judgment. 13. The State shall provide for the continuation of the psychological treatment currently being received by Venessa and Brenda Cantoral Contreras for as long as necessary and under the same conditions. It shall also provide free and immediate * On January 22, 2007, Judge Diego García-Sayan excused himself from hearing the case "pursuant to Article 19 of the Rules of Procedure and 19 [, now 20] of the Rules of Procedure." The then President of the Court, after consulting with the Judges of the Court, decided to accept the aforementioned request in consideration of the aforementioned provisions and after analyzing the reasons stated by Judge GarciaSayan. Consequently, the Judge did not participate in the deliberation and signing of the Judgment or the present Order.