INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF ABRILL ALOSILLA ET AL. v. PERU JUDGMENT OF NOVEMBER 21, 2011 (Interpretation of the Judgment on Merits, Reparations and Costs) In the case of Abrill Alosilla et al., the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”), composed of the following judges:1 Leonardo A. Franco, acting President Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Judge Margarette May Macaulay, Judge Rhadys Abreu Blondet, Judge Alberto Pérez Pérez, Judge, and Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary; in accordance with Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter also “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Article 68 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court 2 (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), decides the request for interpretation of the judgment on merits, reparations and costs in the instant case delivered by the Court on March 4, 2011 (hereinafter also “the judgment” or “the ruling”), filed on May 13, 2011, by the representative of the victims (hereinafter “the representative”). I INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 1. On March 4, 2011, the Court delivered the judgment, which was notified to the parties on March 29, 2011. 1 The President of the Court, Judge Diego García-Sayán, a Peruvian national, did not take part in the instant case pursuant to Article 19(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, according to which “[i]n the cases referred to in Article 44 of the Convention, a judge who is a national of the respondent State shall not be able to participate in the hearing and deliberation of the case.” 2 Rules of Procedure approved by the Court at its eighty-fifth regular session held from November 16 to 28, 2009.