care services and the insufficient training of the “prison guards” (supra considering paragraphs 10 to 13). 19. Based on the foregoing, the Court notes that the information on progress submitted by the State is insufficient to determine full compliance with the Judgment, and therefore decides that the State must present the Court with updated information on the following aspects that remain pending: a) The status of the investigation of the facts of the case and the actions that will be taken within the investigation to apply the measures derived from it to those responsible for the said facts (seventh operative paragraph of the Judgment), and b) The actions and goals as regards improving prison conditions and the provision of human rights training to the prison officials (ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment). In this regard, the State must present detailed information on progress under the actual normative framework, including an implementation timetable and the results that, gradually, it is expected to achieve. In addition, it must provide information on a specific timetable and goals with regard to the process of improving the physical and sanitary conditions of the different prisons, as well as on the food and medical attention for those deprived of liberty. With regard to the training of officials who work in these establishments, it must provide precise information on the implementation and expected results of a human rights training program for them. Regarding all the above, the Court finds it pertinent that the State describe the steps to be taken based on an annual timetable that must be presented to the Court. 20. The Court will consider the general situation of compliance with the Judgment when it has received pertinent information on the aspects of the reparations that remain pending. THEREFORE, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES THAT: 1. It will keep the proceeding of monitoring compliance open with regard to operative paragraphs 7 and 9 of the Judgment concerning the State’s obligation: a) To investigate the facts of the case, and to apply the measures derived from this investigation to those responsible for the said facts, and b) To adopt measures designed to create conditions that permit ensuring to the inmates of Honduran prisons adequate food, medical attention, hygiene and physical conditions, and to implement a training program on human rights for officials who work in the prisons. 6