38. Nevertheless, the Court observes with concern that Gregoria Herminia Recinos Contreras has only been able to have access to medical care on the occasion of a visit to El Salvador, and that the parties have referred to her need to receive dental treatment. In this regard, the Court appreciates the coordination measures taken by the State under the agreement with the Universidad de El Salvador and the Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala in order carry out the victims’ dental treatment in the Republic of Guatemala. Despite this, and taking into account the observation of the representatives that it has still not been possible to implement the victim’s wish to return to El Salvador, the Court considers it necessary that the State deliver to the victim, as established in paragraph 201 of the Judgment, the sum of US$7,500.00 (seven thousand five hundred United States dollars) to cover the costs of the medical and psychological or psychiatric treatment, as well as the medicines and related expenses, in her actual country of residence, without prejudice to being treated by the public health authorities following her return to El Salvador. 39. Based on the above, the Court will continue monitoring compliance with this measure of reparation and awaits updated information from the State. e) Obligation to make the publications established in the Judgment (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment) 40. The State advised that, on March 29, 2012, the “National Day of the Children Disappeared during the Armed Conflict,” it made the publication ordered in a supplement of a national newspaper, as well as in the Official Gazette. In addition, the official summary of the judgment has been available in the format of a digital file on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of El Salvador since April 18, 2012, and the publication of the complete judgment has been available since September 2012 on the official website of the National Search Commission. The State also indicated that, in Note No. 1210 of March 23, 2012, instructions were imparted to the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces, as well as to the different branches and units that provide institutional support, that officers, noncommissioned officers and soldiers should be informed of the official summary of the judgment, and that it should be published before April 6, 2012. This was done within the established time frame. 41. The representatives indicated that the margins of the supplement to the national newspaper with widespread circulation were incomplete and it was not possible to identify the newspaper in which it was published. Consequently, they could not refer to this measure until they had all the information, and were therefore waiting for the State to forward a complete version of the said supplement, which would allow them to determine the newspaper in which the publication had been made. Nevertheless, they acknowledged the information provided by the State regarding the publication of the official summary of the Judgment on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as of April 18, 2012, and the publication of the complete Judgment on the website of the National Search Commission since September 2012. Regarding the State’s obligation to publish the official summary of the Judgment in an internal bulletin of the Armed Forces of El Salvador, they asked the Court to require the State the present the following documents. Note No. 1210, the document in which the said summary was published, and the note in which the Vice Minister advised that the measure had been complied with. Consequently, they asked the Court to consider that this measure of reparation had been fulfilled, when the State had forwarded the required documents. 42. La Commission observed that the State had published the official summary of the Judgment in the Official Gazette of El Salvador, in La Prensa Gráfica and on at least one official website and, to enable the Court to consider that this obligation had been complied 15