7. The State indicated that “on July 15, 2011, the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Republic, by instruction of the Unidad Especializada en la Investigación de Delitos contra el Ambiente y Previstos en Leyes Especiales [Specialized Investigative Unit into Crimes Against the Environment and those Provided for in Special Laws] [(hereinafter UEIDAPLE)], initiated preliminary inquiry number 173/UEIDAPLE/LE/12/2011, in which […] offenses under the Federal Act to Prevent and Punish Torture, to the detriment of Teodoro Cabrera García and Rodolfo Montiel Flores, are being investigated.” It reported that “the inquiry is currently underway” and that, in the course of the investigation, “the integration of certified copies was ordered of the complaint records on the present case composed by the National Commission on Human Rights, and of Criminal Case 61/99 of the Fifth District Court in Criminal Matters of the state of Guerrero, related to the proceedings brought against Messrs. Teodoro Cabrera and Rodolfo Montiel for crimes against health and possession of firearms.” 8. Moreover, the State noted that “[o]n March 7, 2012, the UEIDAPLE obtained an expert opinion on the subject of the methods of injury […] to Messrs. Cabrera García and Montiel Flores[, which is] the basis for the practice of the Specialized Medical Psychological Evaluation for Possible Cases of Torture and/or Ill-treatment (Istanbul Protocol).” It added that on “October 24, 2012, the UEIDAPLE sought to amplify the expert opinion […] of the methods of injury from the following documentation submitted by the [Inter-American] Court”: i) “[e]xpert opinion issued by Ana C. Deutsh, expert in Clinical Psychology with experience in evaluating victims of torture”; ii) [e]xpert opinion issued by José Quiroga, co-founder and [m]edical [d]irector of the Rehabilitation Program for Victims of Torture in Los Angeles, California”; iii) “the documentary produced by Dr. José Eric Muñiz Torres”; and, iv) expert opinion of [D]r. Juana Ma. Del Carmen Gutiérrez Hernández.” On another note, the State reported that “on November 23, 2012, a meeting was held […where] the representatives agreed to communicate the dates on which it would be possible to perform [the evaluation in accordance with the Istanbul Protocol], tentatively proposing the month of January, 2013 for Mr. Teodoro Cabrera García, and February of 2013 in the case Mr. Rodolfo Montiel Flores.” 9. The representatives indicated that, in regards to the twelfth operative paragraph of the Judgment, the State had limited itself to “i) [i]nitiating the preliminary inquiry 173/UIEDAPLE/LE/12/2011[,] and ii) [a]dding to the record of proceedings […] documents contained in other files previously started […] such […] as: the records of preliminary inquiries opened and subsequently archived by the Prosecutor General for Military Justice […], the complaint file of the National Commission on Human Rights, and the criminal proceedings brought against the victims based on false accusations of criminal charges by members of the military.” They added that, “in meetings with various competent authorities of the [Office of the Prosecutor General of the Republic], [they] have proposed that the inquiry move forward by performing other measures, such as, for example, taking statements from the alleged suspects identified by their full name by Rodolfo Montiel Flores, as well as taking steps to identify other members of the military who were allegedly present or involved in the different moments of torture.” 5