22. In the Judgment, the Court ordered the State to: i) publish the official summary of the Judgment issued by the Court in a newspaper with wide national circulation and in a newspaper of a large circulation in the state of Guerrero; ii) fully publish this Judgment in the official web site of the Federal State and of the state of Guerrero, taking into account the characteristics of the publication ordered, which shall remain available for, at least, one year; and iii) broadcast the official summary, at least once, on a radio station to which the members of the municipalities of Petatlán and Coyuca de Catalán have access. Said publications and radio broadcast shall be made within six months following notice of this Judgment. 23. According to the statements made by the parties and the Commission, the Court has been able to verify that the publications ordered in the Judgment 11 and the broadcast of the summary on a radio station 12 were carried out, as well as the fact that the summary published by the State on the website of the state of Guerrero remained there for more than one year. 13 Therefore, the Court declares that the State has complied in full with the obligation contained in the thirteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment. C. Obligation to pay each of the victims once only, within a term of two months, the amount specified in the Judgment, to cover specialized medical and psychological treatment, as well as for medicines and other related expenses (fourteenth operative paragraph) 24. The State reported that, on June 21, 2011, it had paid “Mr. Teodoro Cabrera García and Mrs. Ubalda Cortés Salgado (on behalf of Mr. Rodolfo Montiel Flores) the amounts of $90,374.25 (ninety thousand three-hundred seventy-four pesos and 25/100 M.N.), to each of them, for specialized medical and psychological treatment, as well as for medicines and other related expenses.” Based on the foregoing, the State “request[ed that the Court] consider that it has completely complied with the fourteenth operative paragraph.” 25. Regarding the foregoing, the representatives confirmed that “the victims ha[d] received the ordered amount,” and, thus, requested that the Court find that the fourteenth operative paragraph had been complied with. 26. In this sense, the Commission “t[ook] note of the information received and considere[d] that the State had complied with the present obligation.” 11 Cf. Publication in the Official Gazette of June 7, 2011 (case file of monitoring of compliance with judgment, tome I, folios 72 to 106); Publication of June 7, 2011, in the newspaper “El Universal” (case file of monitoring of compliance with judgment, tome I, folio 117), and Publication of June 24, in the newspaper of State-wide circulation “El Sur, periódico de Guerrero” (case file of monitoring of compliance with judgment, tome I, folios 118). 12 Audio of the radio transmissions of the Judgment carried out on June 16, and on July 1 and 7, 2011 (case file of monitoring of compliance with judgment, tome I, folio 122). 13 Proof of the publications on the web page of the Secretariat of the Interior and on the official portal of the government of the state of Guerrero (case file of monitoring of compliance with judgment, tome I, folios 125 and 126). 9