(a) On March 29, 2012, it had paid the sum of US$5,628,151.60 (five million six hundred and twenty-eight thousand one hundred and fifty one United States dollars and sixty cents).” This amount “includ[ed] [the sum of] US$3,741,000 (three million seven hundred and forty one thousand United States dollars)” corresponding to the payment of the fair compensation established in the second operative paragraph, as well as the sum of “US$1,887,151.60 (one million eight hundred and eighty-seven thousand one hundred and fifty one United States dollars and sixty cents)” corresponding to the payment of the interest accrued on the amount of the fair compensation; (b) On March 23, 2012, it had paid the amount of US$60,000.00 (sixty thousand United States dollars).” It indicated that this amount “included the US$10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars)” corresponding to the payment of non-pecuniary damage, and the US$50,000.00 (fifty thousand United States dollars)" for costs and expenses, and (c) On September 23, 2011, it had paid the sum of US$43,099.10 (forty-three thousand and ninety-nine United States dollars and ten cents) for taxes and fines collected unduly and the corresponding interest. 6. In their observations of October 23, 2012, the representatives indicated that the State “has complied to date with the payments ordered in the Judgment on reparations and costs of March 3, 2011, as regards the reimbursement of the taxes paid, and even the interests, the payment of costs and for the harm caused to the victim, as well as the first payment corresponding to the compensation for the expropriation of the victim’s property, an amount that included the payment of interest.” 7. In its communication of August 14, 2012, the Inter-American Commission assessed positively “the information provided by the State regarding the amounts […] paid.” However, it noted “that the date of payment cannot be inferred from the documentation forwarded as attachment[s]; consequently, it awaits more detailed information from the parties in this regard.” 8. From the information provided by the parties and the Inter-American Commission, and also from the documents forwarded by the State, the Court notes that, in keeping with paragraphs 84 and 101 to 104 of the Judgment, the State has complied with the payment of the first installment of the following obligations: (a) Payment of fair compensation (second operative paragraph of the Judgment), and (b) Payment of the interest accrued on the pecuniary damage (third operative paragraph of the Judgment). Thus, the following remains pending: a) Payment of the sum of US$14,964,000.00 (fourteen million nine hundred and sixty-four thousand United States dollars), in the corresponding installments, for fair compensation (second operative paragraph of the Judgment), and b) Payment of the sum of US$7,548,606.24 (seven million five hundred and fortyeight thousand six hundred and six United States dollars and twenty-four cents) in the corresponding installments for pecuniary damage (third operative paragraph of the Judgment). 3